austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post any technical questions or queries here.
pdaykin
850 Super
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:36 am

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by pdaykin »

I've currently have that set up on my Cooper

There are a few differences as you say - but had no issues when fitting it.
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Vegard »

I've seen this fitted to a Mini, the only snag is the there is even less room for the exhaust.
Giff
850 Super
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Giff »

You could get hold of a Mini remote diff cover and convert the box easily enough.
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Vegard »

Giff wrote:You could get hold of a Mini remote diff cover and convert the box easily enough.
So you find taking it to a machine shop, (provided you don't have the facilities yourself) having the hole measured and in 80% of the cases (no pun intended) having the whole casing linebored easily enough?
Damn, nothing's hard for you is it? :lol:
User avatar
YMJ
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by YMJ »

Vegard wrote:
Giff wrote:You could get hold of a Mini remote diff cover and convert the box easily enough.
So you find taking it to a machine shop, (provided you don't have the facilities yourself) having the hole measured and in 80% of the cases (no pun intended) having the whole casing linebored easily enough?
Damn, nothing's hard for you is it? :lol:
You don't have to get it linebored - just take out the dowel pins and take twice the time torqueing the diff cover and the output shaft covers down.....'never had a problem in the two times I've had to do it. This is one of the great urban Mini myths! :ugeek:
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19835
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by mk1 »

This is one of the great urban Mini myths!

I don't agree.

Doing it the way described above CAN make it more likely to succeed, but as the hole is to all intents & purposes floating, it can just as likely not work.

I have seen gearboxes where the backs have been swapped that don't leak & I have seen ones that leak like taps.

You pays your money & takes your chance.
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Vegard »

I just had several of these patients at a machine shop to have measured. I even found that some of the original 70ies ones with the correct housing couldn't have gaskets as the late 90ies ones, because the hole was too "big".

Measure it if it's OK, then it's OK. I'd never just change the housing and crossing my fingers. That is plain old bodging.
36inter
998 Cooper
Posts: 508
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:15 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by 36inter »

Whats the matter with a good old bodge, got me out of many a fix :mrgreen:
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by guru_1071 »

YMJ wrote:You don't have to get it linebored - just take out the dowel pins and take twice the time torqueing the diff cover and the output shaft covers down.....'never had a problem in the two times I've had to do it. This is one of the great urban Mini myths! :ugeek:

im sorry, but this is utter crap, the cases where line bored for a reason, sure you may be 'lucky' and find one that feels as if it fits in the up & down plane (so there is no lip where the bearing goes, but there is no chance that is will measure the same east & west, and this is before the side plates are fitted.

the factory machined the cases for a reason.

ive seen gearboxs that have had the backs swopped ('because you can do it') that when torqued down, nip the bearings and lock the diff up.

its just not a good practice, and anyone who beleives it is should really buy a mercer bore guage and use it a few times, they may be surprised!!!
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
paul1275s
Basic 850
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:09 pm
Location: East Sussex

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by paul1275s »

36inter wrote:Whats the matter with a good old bodge, got me out of many a fix :mrgreen:
More of a 'Botch' than a 'Bodge'..
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by guru_1071 »

brook shaw wrote:whines like a dog..

the other problem is that when cases are re machined it can remove metal which allows the diff to move intowards the pinion, which removes the backlash from the cwp. this then causes problems with the pinion 'attacking' the crownwheel and wearing it.

ive seen a gold seal box that had so much chopped away that some cwp would simply lock up when it was assembled
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
Giff
850 Super
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Giff »

Bloody hell, have a guess what I just fitted to the rear of a 846..
User avatar
YMJ
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by YMJ »

guru_1071 wrote:
YMJ wrote:You don't have to get it linebored - just take out the dowel pins and take twice the time torqueing the diff cover and the output shaft covers down.....'never had a problem in the two times I've had to do it. This is one of the great urban Mini myths! :ugeek:

im sorry, but this is utter crap, the cases where line bored for a reason, sure you may be 'lucky' and find one that feels as if it fits in the up & down plane (so there is no lip where the bearing goes, but there is no chance that is will measure the same east & west, and this is before the side plates are fitted.

the factory machined the cases for a reason.

ive seen gearboxs that have had the backs swopped ('because you can do it') that when torqued down, nip the bearings and lock the diff up.

its just not a good practice, and anyone who beleives it is should really buy a mercer bore guage and use it a few times, they may be surprised!!!

Well it worked for me......twice.....on racing units! :D
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by guru_1071 »

YMJ wrote:Well it worked for me......twice.....on racing units! :D

i guess you couldnt hearing it complaining over all the sc noise! :lol: :lol: :lol:
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
User avatar
YMJ
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by YMJ »

guru_1071 wrote:
YMJ wrote:Well it worked for me......twice.....on racing units! :D

i guess you couldnt hearing it complaining over all the sc noise! :lol: :lol: :lol:
probably true but it still gave a reasonable output ;) . btw, this was both using rod change boxes :geek:
User avatar
vulcanbb18
Basic 850
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Brisbane, Oz
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by vulcanbb18 »

This is rather topical...

I'm doing a gearbox swap in my 1100 to get it back on the road - thing is the gearbox I have "at hand" ready to go is a mini 4-sync remote box.

I'd prefer to not do the diff casing bodge, and use a mini remote in the 1100 instead. Especially as I've renewed all the bushes in the casing for the remote change, etc.

Anyone done this before? Will the mini remote extension bolt up to the 1100 rear mount ok? One person I asked said it worked no problems, another I asked said he thought the rear mounts were different and it wouldn't work.

Opinions?

cheers,

Jacob
nick@dunsdale
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 885
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:30 pm
Location: Scottish Borders
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by nick@dunsdale »

brook shaw wrote:take it thats why my 60 mini whines like a dog..
swapped the rear housing remote for a wand change housing

it was many years ago,,and i didnt know better
From my experience the old gearbox whine was usually down to a problem on the transfer gears and not the diff
The best repairs go un-noticed
User avatar
Simon776
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Shakspere's county

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by Simon776 »

has anybody fitted this set up to a mini??
The Spanish built Mini 1275C had this as standard from the factory.
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who do not possess it.
618AOG

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by 618AOG »

The diff housing is line bored with the gearbox casing, and it needs to be right. You could try a number of Mini diff housings to find one that was 'close enough'.

Back in the day, dropping 1100/1300 engines and gearboxes into old Minis and using the 1100 remote was never an issue. I would however be welding bridge pieces on both sides of the sandwich plate - if the rubber between the two bits fails and the remote drops down in the road........well, I'll leave that to your imagination. :shock:
User avatar
mab01uk
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 8559
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:08 pm
Location: S.E. England
Has thanked: 252 times
Been thanked: 223 times

Re: austin 1100 remote gear linkage vs mini linkage??

Post by mab01uk »

So.........why did BMC/BL go to this extra trouble and costs of designing two subtlety different gear change remotes doing the exactly the same job on mechanically very similar cars?
If it was for extra refinement on the BMC 1100 range why not improve the Mini at the same time and reduce the production costs with common parts? Many Mini owners of the time also suffered with a 'buzzing' gearlever but I don't ever remember this on the 1100 rubber sandwich remote, so it may also have cured that before the rod change arrived!
Post Reply