Page 2 of 4
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:48 pm
by bwaminispeed
Did the 1098 Clubmans have a tag (GT etc) to differentiate them from the standard 998, and, 1275 GT????
I just remembered where that crossdrilled ENT16 crank came from, it was out of a Clubman wagon that was imported to Canada from South America in a very rusty state as a parts car for a build with a brand new Clubman shell......I believe it was on a rod shift box.....but, no clue what year it might have been....
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:59 pm
by Philsa
Hi Guys
In South Africa we have the clubman 1098 engine that has the crank part number 12G2827. This is a pre A+ engine that is a big bore engine. The engine number will also be 10H and the oil filter will be top left of the engine block a Z93. No tappet chest covers or the like. Also ran rod type gearboxes.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:03 pm
by Spider
Sorry, I didn't mean to distract with my post re: 1100 A+ Engines, but it's fairly clear, while a little obscure, certainly were made - thanks Luis and Al for confirming - as were 850 engines (in an A Block

) up to about 85 - 86 and fitted to the Metro.
I have posted this up here before, this may help to some degree in finding an 1100 crank. It appears there was at least 4 different 1100 Transverse Cranks made, some were cross drilled (bwaminispeed posted one up here a couple of months back), this chart shows regrind and re-treatment limits as suggested by the Factory
The other 1100 crank that's not on that list is the 12G82, which I think was the thin tail type.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:26 pm
by bwaminispeed
And, here it is again.......
Cross-Drilled-998-Crank-02.jpg
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:21 pm
by Costafortune
Spider wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:03 pm
Sorry, I didn't mean to distract with my post re: 1100 A+ Engines, but it's fairly clear, while a little obscure, certainly were made - thanks Luis and Al for confirming - as were 850 engines (in an A Block

) up to about 85 - 86 and fitted to the Metro.
I have posted this up here before, this may help to some degree in finding an 1100 crank. It appears there was at least 4 different 1100 Transverse Cranks made, some were cross drilled (bwaminispeed posted one up here a couple of months back), this chart shows regrind and re-treatment limits as suggested by the Factory
The other 1100 crank that's not on that list is the 12G82, which I think was the thin tail type.
Those are 1275 cranks though........including those used in the 1275 powered 1100 range before the 1300 arrived in 1967.

Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:34 pm
by bwaminispeed
Crank shaft forging number is 12G82.......which, is, none of the above.......
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:46 pm
by 850man
bwaminispeed wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:34 pm
Crank shaft forging number is 12G82.......which, is, none of the above.......
12G82 is a std 1100 crank. We have hundreds of them, mostly all cracked, but 100s all the same.
Still no evidence of a 1100A+ engine being produced...
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:57 pm
by bwaminispeed
Are they all cross drilled???
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:55 am
by Spider
Costafortune wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:54 am
Spider wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 5:52 pm
Costafortune wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:52 pm
There wasn't an A+ 1098 either.
For a brief (and perhaps, obscure) period there was an A+ 1100, in 79 and 80.
I doubt that. I used to service a 1981 Allegro 1100 on an W plate that was most definitely an A Series. These were replaced early '81 by a 998 A+
The A+ was completely different. Everything was changed. BL would not have spent money making an engine they were not fitting to any production cars.
The first car to use an A+ engine was the Morris Ital in mid 1980. The A+ block was however trialled in a handful of cars in 1979-80 including some 998's and therefore very possibly 1100's. They are not A+ engines however.
The Gold Seal replacements 1100 A+ had a Part Nos BKM 1229 and RKM 1151
The A+ went in to production either late 78 or early 79. We started getting them in our 1979 Mokes and there was roughly a 6 month lag between UK production and what we got here at that time.
Costafortune wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:21 pm
Those are 1275 cranks though........including those used in the 1275 powered 1100 range before the 1300 arrived in 1967.
Despite the title on the page, they are not all 1275 cranks.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:25 am
by Supersonic
I've worked on three 1979 Mini Specials over here and all have 1098cc A+ engines with 22G1832 pre-A+ gearboxes, clutch assembly and tranfer gears. All three are factory original cars
Alan
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:21 pm
by Costafortune
Those have A+ blocks. These were trialled by BL before the Metro launch.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:58 pm
by Costafortune
There probably wasn't one, just the few built with A+ blocks to test them long term. I've seen and had enough late Clubmans to know they didn't have one.
But there is no doubt that some Minis had an A+ 998 and 1275 from mid 1980 and before the Metro launch. Given the relatively tiny extra cost of producing a 1098 crank and four pistons, it's a pity BL didn't make one for the Metro HLE with an even taller final drive.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:29 pm
by bwaminispeed
One more time, were all 1100 cranks cross drilled......I have 3 that are.....
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:40 pm
by Supersonic
No the later 12G82 crankshaft was not cross-drilled. The early 12G94 crankshaft had cross-drilled big end journals and according to the 1100 Club records and the book Anatomy of the Classic Mini, they ran from MG 1100cc engine number 10GR/TA/ 101 to 10GR/TA/5706 making 5,605 units.
Alan
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 11:08 pm
by bwaminispeed
Thanks for that info....
My 12G82 crank has cross drilled big ends, (as per picture), does that just mean, it's an earlier 12G82, and, what would it have been in.....
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:22 am
by mk1
850man wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:45 pm
Still no one has shown tangible evidence of an 1100A+ engine.
They were never fitted to Aussie Mokes. The closest we got was a 998 with some A+ casting mods. Or a 1275 with a timing chain tensioner.
Thats because they were never produced.
Someone is being an egotistical maniac again.
850Man, I know you enjoy rubbing people up the wrong way, but there really isn't any need for stuff like this. We can disagree, but there's no need for petty insults!
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:05 am
by Costafortune
mk1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:22 am
850man wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:45 pm
Still no one has shown tangible evidence of an 1100A+ engine.
They were never fitted to Aussie Mokes. The closest we got was a 998 with some A+ casting mods. Or a 1275 with a timing chain tensioner.
Thats because they were never produced.
Someone is being an egotistical maniac again.
850Man, I know you enjoy rubbing people up the wrong way, but there really isn't any need for stuff like this. We can disagree, but there's no need for petty insults!
Indeed.
Everyone knows the correct word is egomaniac.
I never knew there was a special crank for the early MG1100's. What an incredible pool of info this place is.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 1:12 pm
by Supersonic
DSC01605.JPG
DSC01604.JPG
DSC01598.JPG
DSC01597.JPG
Above are the the two Mini Specials I've did work on and both are factory original. Both have A+ engines. BBT 153V has super low mileage and was bought from the Patrick Collection
Alan
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 3:36 pm
by AndyB72
bwaminispeed wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:26 pm
And, here it is again.......
Cross-Drilled-998-Crank-02.jpg
I have a 12G82 exactly the same as yours, cross drilled with the two grooves in the centre.
I also have a 12G82 which isn't cross drilled and doesn't have the grooves. Note 'button' in casting on the right and also some more numbers cast into it.
Re: 1098 Crankshaft
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2020 4:54 am
by 850man
mk1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 8:22 am
850man wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:45 pm
Still no one has shown tangible evidence of an 1100A+ engine.
They were never fitted to Aussie Mokes. The closest we got was a 998 with some A+ casting mods. Or a 1275 with a timing chain tensioner.
Thats because they were never produced.
Someone is being an egotistical maniac again.
850Man, I know you enjoy rubbing people up the wrong way, but there really isn't any need for stuff like this. We can disagree, but there's no need for petty insults!
Sorry Mark, but I tell it how it is.
If that bloke from Sydney is going to continue to talk bullshit on here, the only forum left he hasn't been banned from, then I will continue to ask for evidence of his fairytail stories.
Maybe he should stick to being an Electrician and stop trying to make everyone believe he is some kind of professional Mini specialist.