Component Date Stamps.

Post any technical questions or queries here.
Post Reply
MiniG
Basic 850
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:48 pm

Component Date Stamps.

Post by MiniG »

Are the date stamps on individual components e.g the wiper motor, boot lock, etc the date/period the component was built?. If so how old were the components typically/usually before they were used to build a car?, or were the components date stamped as and when they were used?.
66S

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by 66S »

In my experience, anything from very current to about 3 months.

Al
User avatar
Simon776
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Shakspere's county

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by Simon776 »

As Al says it varies - wiper motors - the easiest thing to see, seem to have the biggest variations. Have seen a six month old one on a very original one owner car.
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who do not possess it.
66S

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by 66S »

I agree Simon, wiper motors often seem to be the oldest stamp. Lucas possibly made big batches of them and they were stock-piled.

Al
Benny
850 Super
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by Benny »

A friend of mine is very big on parts being appropriately date stamped for his cars (MGBs). His rule of thumb is that the component can be date stamped 6 months prior to the production date of his cars, otherwise, he won't buy the part.

According to him, that is an appropriate period for how they were stocked
User avatar
Pete
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 11182
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:47 pm
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by Pete »

If I was restoring a car (I am ! :lol: ) I'd keep as many bits of the car (of the right type) that were on it when I got it, even if that meant a dizzy five years younger than the car or a Goldseal engine two years younger than the car cos to me they're part of it's history. I have to say I do tend to eye a fifty year old car that's got all the correct date stamps on with suspicion, ie it's kind of been concocted. Cynical, me ??!! :lol:
JC T ONE
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:25 am
Location: Denmark

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by JC T ONE »

The oldest date I found, on my car was probably the indicator stalk = 34/73 (cant remember the week on my org stoplight switch) and the latest is 40/73 (one of the doorlocks)

I only corrected 1 date so far = the light switch, which had been changed in 1992, but this "new" item was also starting to melt = H4 headlamps.
So I restored a correct switch, with dates that matched the other switches, as a new one would look wrong.

I also found a wiper motor with 38/73 dating that I will fit (some day) problem is, you wont see it on a LHD, the same way you do in a RHD.
814CWE
998 Cooper
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:24 pm
Location: in my workshop

Re: Component Date Stamps.

Post by 814CWE »

not always the case of wiper motors being made 6 months before hand
my oct 62 morris super has a sept 62 wiper motor and oct 62 dizzy

maybe morris didnt stockpile as many as austin so got through the smaller batches in parts bins much faster ??

my other morris cars all have very close lucas date codes to manufacture build dates

the austins i have seem a good few months behind...

think there is a pattern here???
for my sins,i own a 1957 wolsleley 1500
Post Reply