Advice on balancing conrods
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:26 pm
- Location: Scotland
Advice on balancing conrods
Hoping that someone on this forum can point me in the right direction. I'm putting together a 970 motor for occasional use in hillclimbs and have just been checking the rods.
To start with these looked pretty well matched, with overall weights of 711, 713, 708, and 705 grams. However on checking the end-to-end weights the differences are a bit larger at 525-186, 533-180, 528-180, 533-172 grams.
What tolerances are advised for end-to-end rod balancing? Does it really matter?
To start with these looked pretty well matched, with overall weights of 711, 713, 708, and 705 grams. However on checking the end-to-end weights the differences are a bit larger at 525-186, 533-180, 528-180, 533-172 grams.
What tolerances are advised for end-to-end rod balancing? Does it really matter?
-
- Basic 850
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:33 pm
- Location: Canada
- Spider
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 4805
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 6:10 am
- Location: Big Red, Australia
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
They'll work surprisingly well as they are however the better matched they can be, the happier the crank will be, although on a 970 it becomes less fussy.
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:26 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
Thanks for the feedback guys.
Red - sounds like your race shop does a good job.
Spider - I think you may be right, may not be so essential. I am in two minds here as once I start balancing them then I will probably end up getting them lightened, polished, and shot peened.
Red - sounds like your race shop does a good job.
Spider - I think you may be right, may not be so essential. I am in two minds here as once I start balancing them then I will probably end up getting them lightened, polished, and shot peened.
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:26 pm
- Location: Warwickshire
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
We normally do them to 0.1 of a gram.
If you lighten , balance , resize , shot peen and fit new ARP bolts it will probably be cheaper to get a set of H beams
If you lighten , balance , resize , shot peen and fit new ARP bolts it will probably be cheaper to get a set of H beams
- Vegard
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
Good luck with these two.. Reminds me how much I hate lightening and balancing rods....525-186, 533-172 grams.
-
- Basic 850
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:44 pm
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
Hallo and A MERRY CHRISTMAS & A HAPPY NEW YEARE everyone.
Rods 970S. I/WE have built a couple of very successful 970S FIA pre-65 engines that I raced the few last seasons. If we take value for money I agree that they are fine enough for sensible road use. But for competition you should prepare them in the sense that that other authors has described above.
BUT! I always have had brand new in box witch is no guaranty that they basically are OK. First check that the seats for the main bearings are 100% round at the right measure. If that is not take care about it and it does not matter if they are done by a gold smith becouse thats where the problem will start if any place. Than shave of and get a reasonable even surface to up to a point it will prevent rev related damages. You can rev all way up to 8.000rpm trouble free ( race engine ) and in tight situations even more.
In the end you will see that new 970S rods, all machining, weight adjustment and ARP leads you to the conclusion it is better, easier and cheaper to buy new H type rods. ( I can not use them due to APP.K ).
Tommy
Rods 970S. I/WE have built a couple of very successful 970S FIA pre-65 engines that I raced the few last seasons. If we take value for money I agree that they are fine enough for sensible road use. But for competition you should prepare them in the sense that that other authors has described above.
BUT! I always have had brand new in box witch is no guaranty that they basically are OK. First check that the seats for the main bearings are 100% round at the right measure. If that is not take care about it and it does not matter if they are done by a gold smith becouse thats where the problem will start if any place. Than shave of and get a reasonable even surface to up to a point it will prevent rev related damages. You can rev all way up to 8.000rpm trouble free ( race engine ) and in tight situations even more.
In the end you will see that new 970S rods, all machining, weight adjustment and ARP leads you to the conclusion it is better, easier and cheaper to buy new H type rods. ( I can not use them due to APP.K ).
Tommy
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:26 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
All useful feedback, slightly depressing to read that 251ENG is balancing rod sets to within 0.1gram and my set weights are over 10 grams out. Hey Ho!
Having checked the rods for overall dimensions it turns out that the machining of the little ends on rods 1&3 is different to rods 2&4. Width across flats is 29.8mm for 1&3, and 28.7mm for 2&4. If I correct this for 1&3 by milling to the same dimensions as 2&4 this removes about 3.5 grams.
That should give me 525-182.5, 533-180, 528-176.5, and 533-172 end to end rod weights. Still miles out but I can then equalise the big end weights relatively easily, again on the mill. Then it will probably be a case of selective assembly with suitably heavy gudgeon pins in 3 and 4 to get it all within a gram or so.
PS. Would be great to go for a set of H-beams but I don't think Santa will be that generous.
Having checked the rods for overall dimensions it turns out that the machining of the little ends on rods 1&3 is different to rods 2&4. Width across flats is 29.8mm for 1&3, and 28.7mm for 2&4. If I correct this for 1&3 by milling to the same dimensions as 2&4 this removes about 3.5 grams.
That should give me 525-182.5, 533-180, 528-176.5, and 533-172 end to end rod weights. Still miles out but I can then equalise the big end weights relatively easily, again on the mill. Then it will probably be a case of selective assembly with suitably heavy gudgeon pins in 3 and 4 to get it all within a gram or so.
PS. Would be great to go for a set of H-beams but I don't think Santa will be that generous.
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:26 pm
- Location: Warwickshire
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
Pulled sets with more that 10g variation in to balance before .
You want to try doing some Austin Healey 3000 rods , they weigh over 1kg each and sometimes are miles out
The worst situation is where you have rods that have been massively lightened and are a long way out , you just run out of metal to take off without compromising strength . Small bore A series rods can be the worst because the beams are so thin .
You want to try doing some Austin Healey 3000 rods , they weigh over 1kg each and sometimes are miles out
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c439a/c439a924c6712aed6b46d860574b8ef8e725be03" alt="Very Happy :D"
The worst situation is where you have rods that have been massively lightened and are a long way out , you just run out of metal to take off without compromising strength . Small bore A series rods can be the worst because the beams are so thin .
- Spider
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 4805
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 6:10 am
- Location: Big Red, Australia
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Advice on balancing conrods
That's persistence!!251 ENG wrote:We normally do them to 0.1 of a gram.
I'd agree. Having done a few sets, I doubt that I ever bother again. The hours don't justify it - unless comp regs don't allow aftermarket rods. The aftermarket rods are nearly always stronger and lighter right out of the box !251 ENG wrote:
If you lighten , balance , resize , shot peen and fit new ARP bolts it will probably be cheaper to get a set of H beams