Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: Camden NSW AUSTRALIA
Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
I am rebuilding several MkI Lockheed brake boosters.
Question: Was the non-return valve fitted to the booster? Or to the manifold end of the vacuum hose?
There is a non-return valve which screws into the booster body and joins the vacuum line from the manifold - p/n 17H2646. The original part has been unavailable for some time and has been substituted by an in-line valve requiring the vacuum hose to be cut.
Mini Spares now has the "original" non-return valve, made by/for AP.
BUT my supplier says that this valve must be fitted to the manifold end to allow vacuum to 'flow' from the booster to the manifold. It cannot be connected to the booster body because it won't flow in that direction.
Is AP wrong?
Question: Was the non-return valve fitted to the booster? Or to the manifold end of the vacuum hose?
There is a non-return valve which screws into the booster body and joins the vacuum line from the manifold - p/n 17H2646. The original part has been unavailable for some time and has been substituted by an in-line valve requiring the vacuum hose to be cut.
Mini Spares now has the "original" non-return valve, made by/for AP.
BUT my supplier says that this valve must be fitted to the manifold end to allow vacuum to 'flow' from the booster to the manifold. It cannot be connected to the booster body because it won't flow in that direction.
Is AP wrong?
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:19 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Been thanked: 1 time
- rich@minispares.com
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 6806
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:16 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
the modern ones screw into the manifold
i.e they suck through the thread
i.e they suck through the thread
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 746
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
I've got two cars from the same era each with a different location for the non-return valve - one on manifold, the other on the booster



-
- Basic 850
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Mine's work with the non return valve on the manifold. The socket on the booster is just a socket. I really wonder how some one gets vacuum on the booster with a non return valve on the booster?
- Ronnie
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:37 pm
- Location: N/E England Where the SAND is GOLDEN and the sea is always COLD!!
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
It depends on which way round you put the valve you are just mooving it further down/upstream, as long as the valve is orientated the correct way it will make no difference where it is in the line. 

-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: Camden NSW AUSTRALIA
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Thank you all for replies.
All very interesting - that there were valves that went on the booster (blew) and those that went on the manifold (sucked).
All very interesting - that there were valves that went on the booster (blew) and those that went on the manifold (sucked).
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:44 am
- Location: Southern Tablelands (Oz)
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Caaarrrm on... its a one way valve. Air passes one way and not the other...It doesn't suck or blow.Aussie Bill B wrote:Thank you all for replies.
All very interesting - that there were valves that went on the booster (blew) and those that went on the manifold (sucked).
As has been pointed out, functionally it doesn't matter where it goes in the line - as long as its the right way 'round.
Otherwise its trainspotters argument.
For arguments sake though... my BMC workshop manual (circa 1967) contains the statement "Unscrew the non-return valve from the side of the slave cylinder." as the final step in disassembling the booster. Unfortunately I have no idea whether this is a Lockheed or Girling unit - other than its the type fitted to a Mk I S.
Cheers, Ian
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: West Sussex
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
I totally agree with this!1071 S wrote:Caaarrrm on... its a one way valve. Air passes one way and not the other...It doesn't suck or blow.
As has been pointed out, functionally it doesn't matter where it goes in the line - as long as its the right way 'round.
As far as I am aware, the main purpose of the valve is to prevent destruction of
the servo unit in the event of a "back-fire"...
It allows the engine's vacuum to suck on the servo unit to produce extra braking,
but will not allow any manifold explosion back up the pipe which would damage
the diaphragm.
There is nothing technical about this at all...
(But if you are an electronics nerd, it's a "diode").
Ian
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:05 pm
- Location: Malta
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
The main purpose of the valve is to hold the vacum in the booster chamber, otherwise you wont get constant vacum .
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: West Sussex
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
I'd go with this answer, with my own attempt being relegatedcpr1 wrote:The main purpose of the valve is to hold the vacum in the booster chamber,
otherwise you wont get constant vacum .
to a secondary benefit...
Ian
-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: Camden NSW AUSTRALIA
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Thanks Toby.Toby wrote:Does this answer your question? Fresh out of the box
The photo shows the one-way valve is on the body of the booster. But does it allow air to flow out of the booster or into the booster? It must let air flow from the threaded end of the valve to the hose barb end of the valve to create a vacuum in the booster for it to work.
The new valves from Mini Spares fit onto the manifold and so only allow air to move from the hose end of the valve to the threaded end of the valve, into the manifold vacuum.
Caaarrrm on 1071S... it does have to be the "right way round" and that's the point of my original question. You cannot reverse the valve.It's nothing to do with trainspotting.
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 746
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Correct. But the point is not all the valves let air move in the same direction. Hence the original question and hence it makes a difference where you fit it. If the valve lets air go from the threaded end to the hose end, it goes on the booster. If it lets air go from the hose end to the threaded end, it goes on the manifold.1071 S wrote:Caaarrrm on... its a one way valve. Air passes one way and not the other...It doesn't suck or blow.
As has been pointed out, functionally it doesn't matter where it goes in the line - as long as its the right way 'round.
-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: Camden NSW AUSTRALIA
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Thank you abri. That is exactly my point.
As several answers have said, there are 2 kinds of valve getting around.
As several answers have said, there are 2 kinds of valve getting around.
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:30 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
The valve shown on Toby's picture lets the engine suck the air from the servo, ie, air passes from the servo end to the hose end.
The following 2 types work on the opposite manner. I don't know about modern stuff.
The engine must be able to suck the air from the servo ("vaccum booster"), so you need to fit the valve that allows it to happen.


The following 2 types work on the opposite manner. I don't know about modern stuff.
The engine must be able to suck the air from the servo ("vaccum booster"), so you need to fit the valve that allows it to happen.


-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:19 am
- Location: Camden NSW AUSTRALIA
Re: Cooper/S Lockheed brake booster question.
Thanks Ricardo for the photos.
It makes some sense, although I've never seen those valves fitted to the manifold.
Bill
It makes some sense, although I've never seen those valves fitted to the manifold.
Bill