Logically it would be better to have them on top so that there is reduced possibility of vibration causing the pipe to contact the frame where it goes under the cross member. It would also been more logical to clip the pipe at the ends by the bends to ensure it did not contact. However not sure that logic and BMC always applied...
So the next question is when did BMC start this? 732 HOP, built March 1963, didn't have it and neither, it seems, did 898 KMJ built mid August 1963. They were definitely being painted by June 1964.
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who do not possess it.
Simon776 wrote:So the next question is when did BMC start this? 732 HOP, built March 1963, didn't have it and neither, it seems, did 898 KMJ built mid August 1963. They were definitely being painted by June 1964.
My 64 1071 black painted, built April 64
Last edited by Gareth Brandt on Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My October 63 car looks to have some of black the paint on the stiffener (original front panel) when I get a chance I'll get the grill off and have a good look
Toby wrote:Any original 997s about with a black painted front panel?
I have a December 1961 built Austin Seven Cooper 997 that had a black painted front panel. I can't be 100% certain that it is original, but the shell is remarkably intact for its age and I believe that the front panel is original.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Toby wrote:August 63 1071, and this was taken in 78:
Just noticed Gary Dicken's grey car next to it! It hasn't changed much.....
When I lived in Somerton in the 1970's, there were a couple of local herberts in a 1071 S that looked just like that. It was later painted a vile purple colour before disappearing. I wonder if it's the same car? If it doesn't, I bet the logbook it safely stored in an envelope.