Next steps for reducing emissions from road transport:-
https://content.tfl.gov.uk/next-steps-f ... nsport.pdf

Someone who works at Heathrow airport was telling me they have to drive into the expanded ULEZ zone from outside, by car due to their work shifts which start before midnight and finish some hours later the next morning. As their car will be charged crossing into the zone on the way to work at Heathrow it will cost £12.50, then driving home early the next morning will cost another £12.50 for the return trip....he does not have a highly paid job, he can't afford to live within London near Heathrow and maybe use public transport and he can't afford to buy a replacement for his 2014 non-compliant diesel car...(In 2001, Gordon Brown – then Chancellor – introduced lower vehicle tax for diesel cars on the basis they were less polluting and would bring down overall carbon dioxide levels....).72MiniPickUp wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:07 pm It’s all very well saying go by public transport but what happens if you work outside of those hours? My partner is a train driver, how can he go to work by train when he has to take the things out of the depot in the morning to start the service!
It is purely a stitch up to raise money to plug the huge 'Black Hole' in TFL's budget....if it was for air pollution and to save lives you would not let drivers pay £12.50 to continue using a 'dirty' vehicle within the zone....
I suppose the argument for taxing EVs will be >50% of traffic pollution is tyre pollution.....and because they are heavier.....mab01uk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 6:08 pmIt is purely a stitch up to raise money to plug the huge 'Black Hole' in TFL's budget....if it was for air pollution and to save lives you would not let drivers pay £12.50 to continue using a 'dirty' vehicle within the zone....
Once the camera infrastructure is in place on the back of this, there are already plans being put forward by Transport for London for 'smart' road charging for ALL vehicles....including EV's.
Why is it that makes me smile so muchmab01uk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 14, 2023 11:36 pm Anti-Ulez 'Blade Runner' campaigner chops down enforcement cameras with tree lopper:-
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ ... 00577.html
This is being reported on some of the internet news sites as well.mab01uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:10 pm Londoners buy up classic cars to dodge Sadiq Khan’s Ulez expansion.
Londoners are taking to classic cars as a way of dodging Sadiq Khan’s Ulez charge.
"Dealers say they have witnessed a surge in interest as the capital braces for the £12.50 charge to expand to cover all 32 boroughs next week, while older cars selling online are being advertised for their exemption status.
Cars manufactured before 1983 qualify as “historic vehicles” and do not need to pay the Mayor’s clean air levy to drive in London. They can also be registered for an exemption from vehicle tax.
Merlin McCormack, owner of Duke of London, a vintage car dealership in Brentford, said it was “ironic” that some of his customers buying more affordable classic cars were doing so because they are Ulez-exempt, despite the vehicles being more polluting than modern counterparts.
He said: “We sell a lot of entry level classic cars as well as high end stuff. A lot of what we sell is very driveable early 80s [and] late 70s and where they are [Ulez] exempt a lot of customers are looking to buy that as their sole London car.”
He added that Ulez was now a deciding factor for most of his customers who drive in London.
Reselling and auctioneer website Car & Classic currently has several vehicles listed for sale in and around London advertising that they are exempt from the Ulez charge, such as a 1970 Hillman Imp Super for £9,500 and a 1972 Austin Mini for £20,000.
Transport for London allows for a rolling 40-year window that currently permits Ulez exemptions for cars manufactured in the early eighties."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consu ... expansion/