Standard starter vs. CR

Post any technical questions or queries here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Vegard »

I just tried to start my freshly built 1293 race engine. I tried two starters and they both really struggled with a fresh battery. Should I expect starting my 12:1 CR engine with a SW23 cam with a Lucas starter?
ivor badger
998 Cooper
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:45 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by ivor badger »

Why not, lots of people have including the works team. The works minis used a slightly different starter with heavier internals from another vehicle. Something like M35G (?), I did some checking once and it came off something like an MG ZA.

Check the terminal connections and the commutator brushes.
Red1967
Basic 850
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:33 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Red1967 »

No the older starters are not strong enough on higher CR. You need a good starter to crank over the engine fast enough. I have a pre A+ 1293 with 10.8:1. I burnt out the old starter pretty quick. It would cut out before the engine fired. I bought this one from Mini Mania C-GEU9404. Never had an issue. Engine turns over beautifully. They have a verto model too.
66S

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by 66S »

I have not had problems with the old M35G bit the later M35J's are a bit hopeless.

Al
Chalkie

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Chalkie »

alot of the turbo boys use High torque starter motors to fire there cars up
ivor badger
998 Cooper
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:45 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by ivor badger »

RidingLow wrote:alot of the turbo boys use High torque starter motors to fire there cars up
Since you use low static CR in a turbo, why would there be any problem for it with the starter. Used the standard Lucas starter for years with 12.5/1. It just needs to be in good condition.
Chalkie

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Chalkie »

ivor badger wrote:
RidingLow wrote:alot of the turbo boys use High torque starter motors to fire there cars up
Since you use low static CR in a turbo, why would there be any problem for it with the starter. Used the standard Lucas starter for years with 12.5/1. It just needs to be in good condition.
I know but its what they use though

Madmk1 he used one on his old 1293 :) before he went turbo unless hes still using it not sure
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by guru_1071 »

just get a std starter rewound 9v, pov spec crbeatrz!!!


they dont last to long though! :lol:
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
scooperman
Basic 850
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by scooperman »

Vegard, one odd thing was that the old Lucas starter would spin my race motor OK when it had the distributor, but when I went to wasted-spark crank-triggered ignition, that caused the engine to kick the inertia drive out of the flywheel before it would start. Then I got some old Honda Civic gear-reduction starters from the junkyard and made them fit the Mini bell housing, big improvement. 1989 Isuzu Trooper 2.6L starters are supposed to fit perfectly, the next time I need one that's what I will try.
Austin Cooper
Basic 850
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Bristol

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Austin Cooper »

The reason people, like myself, use hi-torque starters in turbo minis is to save space, not because they need them. My engine with 8.3:1 compression starts very easily with a standard starter. I'm using a Brise one as the solenoid is on the end and the casing can be rotated so the terminal is in the position you want. This is very useful when you are trying to use a front mounted radiator and find space for all the pipework. It's all a bit irrelevant to this topic anyway, but I just thought I'd clear that up.
atlanticdave
Basic 850
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by atlanticdave »

1380 11:5:1 cr killed 2.5 starters, fitted a wasp Hi Torque had no issues since, also fitted one to my friends TR4A, has made a huge difference to that fires up with little effort now compared to what it used to be, no more fingers crossed moments.
User avatar
Pete
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 11182
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:47 pm
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Pete »

Anyone used the Powerlite one ? Quite a bit cheaper than Brise though slightly heavier. (There again I've just saved thirty odd kgs taking off by Hornet bonnet and boot lid so not too concerned !)
http://www.autoelectricsupplies.co.uk/p ... tegory/139

Is it the same as the one Shifty sells ?
User avatar
In the shed
998 Cooper
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:10 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by In the shed »

One of the local chaps in the village was into mini racing in the very beginning. They had something like a 14.5:1 engine which needed a tow to start it!

I've never had any problems with any starter on all sorts of engines. Apart from the one I had to whack with the handle of a hammer!
User avatar
Spider
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 4805
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 6:10 am
Location: Big Red, Australia
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by Spider »

The Lucus Starters are not brilliant at the best of times, but when in good condition should easily turn over engines up to 12.5:1 with stock cam profiles.

Most of the time when they get like yours is, the front bush (as in bearing type bush) has worn. Try turning the whole starter motor over 180 degrees and bolting it back in, not a fix wut if it works, you'll know the problem.

There are starter motors from 4 cylinder Isuzi Cars that just about fit right in, just need to file the holes closer together. Cheap at the wreckers and last forever.
sracing
Basic 850
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: Standard starter vs. CR

Post by sracing »

Lucas starters are Ok, though its worth watching out for dodgy remanufactured starters when buying a new one. The Powerlite starters are of the gear reduction type. One of the biggest benefits is that they draw considerably less current and are also more powerful. I believe Powerlite use the 1KW unit which will spin any engine regardless of compression etc, hot or cold. I have fitted Powerlite starters to several different cars, problems all solved.
Post Reply