Page 1 of 1
Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:38 pm
by tedmcedd
I was wondering if there were any advantages to twin stombergs over twin SUs...?
I dont really know the differences between??
any advice?
Ed
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:43 pm
by 66S
In my experience, SU's are simpler (no diaphragm) and work a tad better.
Regards
Al
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:08 pm
by mk1
I agree, stombergs offer no advantage over the good old SU.
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:42 pm
by Toby
Haven't compared my Stromberg setup against a regular setup of HS2s but I believe they are slightly less tall. Which would mean better for sprints, marcos, jem, etc
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:51 pm
by coopertim
I had an Alexander Conversion on my 850 a few years ago. They suffered from fuel evaporation when the engine was hot - so much that i had to restart the car on the solenoid!! Always ran lumpy too.
Tim
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:14 am
by mk1
Strombergs are no good for Sprints, I tried a pair on mine when I was trying to find an 1.5" carb that would fit. They were lower, but were also "Chunkier" making them even harder to fit on a sprint than a pair of SU's.
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:35 pm
by tedmcedd
I'll keep my money then!
thanks guys!
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:16 am
by 12G940
In the 60's I changed the strombergs on Imp sport rally engines to SU's to make another 4bhp, from there on other engine mods could take place, I think Roots would have used SU's as well but BMC had the licence
Re: Stromberg Carbs...
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:27 am
by andy1071
There also seems to be a lot more needles available for SUs, so they tend to be easier to set accurately.