Page 1 of 1

Stories from British Leyland 1969 to 1980 (Miniworld 2010)

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:56 pm
by mab01uk
I originally posted these brief extracts from a MW article on the MCR 'off topic' forum back in 2009 but was reminded about it today so thought I'd re-post it here for anyone on Mk1 forum who may be interested or missed the original MW articles:

(The full article was published in the Jan/Feb 2010 Miniworld magazines)
An interesting 2 part article in Miniworld magazine by Leslie Palmer who in 1969 became BL's first non-clerical, salaried female employee aged 22 taken on as a graduate management trainee to investigate new methods of working.
In Part 1 she gives several examples of finding management not really knowing if cars such as Coopers or Healeys were actually making a loss and relates how she discovered the Mini 850 was being sold cheaper than the 1000cc even though for 2 or 3 years it had cost more to manufacture its engine because the volume point meant having them specifically engineered. Customers who bought the cars expected smaller to be cheaper but it wasn't the case............

She later needed the basic totals of cars produced and sold each week to make sales projections, etc. Before computerisation this was worked out by hand on a paper spreadsheet. What was built on plant versus what was out at the dealerships and what was sold proved impossible to find out as there was a discrepancy of at least 20% a month. No one knew exactly where all the cars were or how many there were. She found the guy responsible for the figures only to find this had been the case for 12 years! It seems every Friday night a man went out with a torch and wandered round the Longbridge plant counting cars. It turned out the cars were being moved around to make space for more, the paperwork stuck to windscreens often got blown away and once lost mean't the now unidentified cars stood for months on end effectively lost in the system (or lack of one). She says that before 1969 the volumes of Minis, etc, produced were still small enough to keep control of with the old system but from 1969 until about 1978 the explosion in volume plus labour disputes, supplier disputes and lack of enough car parking, along with the workers holidays coinciding with the August registration suffix sales boom compounded the problems.

She goes on to say the Mini Coopers never made money due to the low volumes with high cost of many non-standard parts fitted and that the price premium made it less desirable as a new car but very popular as a secondhand model. The 1275GT replacement was however highly profitable due to mainly using standard parts but John Cooper would not compromise on this, she insists it was this rather than his £2 per car payment that caused the Coopers to be discontinued by BL. "There were huge arguments as the Cooper was a very popular model internally with staff, but the Cooper wasn't selling enough. The 1275GT made money the Cooper didn't."

Part 2 starts with the work on the 9X the proposed Mini replacement. Asked about any dealings with 9X or Issigonis himself Leslie says, "We saw it from time to time. It never had much support internally. There wasn't money for it, budgets were tight and there wasn't room for it. His was an approach of what he thought the motor industry ought to be, as opposed to what it was. I don't think anybody thought it had legs. There was a bit of support from the emotional sense, but not in a commercial sense. I'd say he was being indulged rather than it was ever a valid project. That sounds dreadful but it's probably true. They put him out to grass, although he was still respected. I didn't meet him directly, I saw him give a lecture or two. The problem he had, or the problem we had with him, was his unwillingness to ever engage with commercialisation. He would only ever do what he wanted to do and he was quite difficult in that sense."

She goes on to describe the discord and discontent with the 'Red Robbo' wildcat strikes, lack of secret workers ballots and abuse of power by both unions and management in the 1970's.

Also the issue of organised stealing from plants is covered. "There was actually a price list of parts for every car that was produced in Longbridge that anybody could buy at a discount. It was eventually traced to a man with a garage better stocked out than our stores. The filching was co-ordinated, it had to be, it had to be done in collaboration with so many people in production control or the stores."

The article concludes with descriptions of the sexism rife amongst workers and management at the time, the class driven divisive structures - there were four different levels of dining room/canteens (Directors included free bar) - and details some of the problems with the old, inherited tired and inefficient dealer network, also gives some interesting background on the launch of the very popular and successful 1979 Mini 20th Anniversary Special, why the Mini kept getting reprieved and finally the 1980 launch of the Metro after which she left Leyland to work elsewhere in market research for the Motor Industry.

Re: Stories from British Leyland 1969 to 1980 (Miniworld 201

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:49 am
by guru_1071
i heard a very very interesting story about the 9x just this week, i think a few people will be surprised when it 'outs' :D

Re: Stories from British Leyland 1969 to 1980 (Miniworld 201

Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:08 pm
by 618AOG
BMC should never have happened - Austin and Morris joining up was madness as both companies were big enough to do their own thing and both companies were in good health. Ford and Vauxhall didn't merge and both were still going through the 60's, 70's and 80's. If Ford and Vauxhall had merged, imagine the utter chaos and inter rivallry between Dagenhan, Luton, Ellesmere Port and Halewood, the mishmash of dealers not really knowing what they could and couldn't sell. It would have been a disaster.

It's likely that neither Austin or Morris would still be here today as they were, but they would have probably survived a lot longer. With just one plant each, they could have concentrated on making half decent family cars. Without the incredible burden of the various useless factories BL inherited, they would have had far more money to spend on proper development.

Alot of folk blame BMW for the Rover meltdown but really, BL should have been closed down in the seventies and the various factories sold off to other companies who could have used them better - the Japanese for instance........