570 FMO
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:15 pm
by worksminis » 30 Apr 2017, 18:48
Monte Carlo January 64. Makinen/Vanson. Group 2.
Used as a recce car?
Spa-Sofia-Liege August 64. Wadsworth/Wood. Non-homologated spec. cars permitted.
Sold to K. James
Browning records this car (and 569FMO) as first registered in November 63. This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number.
There is a suggestion the 64 Monte rally cars were all used for Monte recce at some point. (The non-FMO Monte cars were older registrations). This would explain the Nov 63 registration.
The Monte car would have had a 1071 engine like winner 33 EJB (1275 not yet homologated).
The Liege car had a 1275 (1293). It is described by Wood in “The Last Liege” as, towards the end, “the body was getting a little loose at the seams”. It had been kicked by a donkey on the rear n/s quarter. It had been rolled on to its side to change the couplings (probably not as carefully as that was done on later occasions). The sump guard was held up with rope around the front body top Xmember.
It seems likely that, as for 569FMO, the reg number was sold with the car because, as a pre-suffix registration, it was already looking a bit dated.
There is no proof available that there was not a number plate swap with another car between the two works appearances but it seems unlikely.
Monte Carlo January 64. Makinen/Vanson. Group 2.
Used as a recce car?
Spa-Sofia-Liege August 64. Wadsworth/Wood. Non-homologated spec. cars permitted.
Sold to K. James
Browning records this car (and 569FMO) as first registered in November 63. This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number.
There is a suggestion the 64 Monte rally cars were all used for Monte recce at some point. (The non-FMO Monte cars were older registrations). This would explain the Nov 63 registration.
The Monte car would have had a 1071 engine like winner 33 EJB (1275 not yet homologated).
The Liege car had a 1275 (1293). It is described by Wood in “The Last Liege” as, towards the end, “the body was getting a little loose at the seams”. It had been kicked by a donkey on the rear n/s quarter. It had been rolled on to its side to change the couplings (probably not as carefully as that was done on later occasions). The sump guard was held up with rope around the front body top Xmember.
It seems likely that, as for 569FMO, the reg number was sold with the car because, as a pre-suffix registration, it was already looking a bit dated.
There is no proof available that there was not a number plate swap with another car between the two works appearances but it seems unlikely.