1963 Austin Countryman

Images & stories about our current projects, cars, engines & all sorts of other stuff.
Post Reply
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

Time to get started again - everything has been in pieces for a long time and I now have the opportunity to spend some more time on the car.
Distributor, carbs, gauges, engine/cylinder head, trailing arms, brackets/sheet metal parts/chromework, steering rack are back from refurbishing/plating etc.
The wood frame is on its way back.

I have ordered a spraycan of BMW/Mini Pepper White and it looks like that will be the colour.

Current state of the shell:

Image




Rebuilt the diff today.

The output shafts in the diff had badly worn and chipped teeth and really worn planet gears. Like every other moving part on the car, it was showing its 150000+ miles.
I found some that were 'less bad', can anyone tell me if they are OK to use?

The best ones I have handy (photo makes them look worse than they are, score marks are not deep enough to catch your fingernail):

Image

This is one that I took out. The scoring easily catches your fingernail:

Image
nunecos
Basic 850
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Coimbra, Portugal

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by nunecos »

Really nice! Is it to restore to standard spec ?
2 Mk1 and 1 Mk2 to restore...
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

Standard spec except the coil spring clutch, single leading shoe brakes, cylinder are going into storage, diff ratio changed to 3.4.
Original parts are there for someone else can put that stuff back on if they really want to.
And I'm probably going to paint it old english white instead of almond green.
Everything is very original (original unrebuilt engine, coil spring clutch, carpets, a-type gearbox etc) but the odometer broke at 149,999 miles.
Unfortunately the high mileage means every moving part is totally worn out and a lot of the trim is a bit too far gone. If anyone has any green front seat covers, door cards, left front dash panel, ...

It has had one front wing/a-panel replaced previously because of accident damage.
The doors look almost like new but have some rust in the bottom, which means they need as much work as if they were much worse condition, and the front panels have so many scars that they need to be replaced, which is unfortunate. Likewise the floors are rust free but have been ruined by people putting the jack under them to change the tyres.

Currently battling with the rear load floor corners. As far as I know, nobody makes proper repair panels and the shape is a little tricky to duplicate, even though nobody will see it.

Image
InimiaD
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:20 pm
Location: West of Offas Dyke.

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by InimiaD »

Great to see another Countryman being restored back to health.
M Machine do the repair panels you require. I did those sections on my Traveller and although they weren't a perfect fit they did the job after a bit of Tin Bashing.
Keep us updated with the progress.
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

Thanks, I have had a go with the M-Machine patches, but I didn't do a great job of piecing them all together. Easier to fabricate from scratch I think.

Took the door skins off today:

Image

Can anyone say if the lower door repair panels are any good? REPAN037 from Somerford.

Image
coop12g295
998 Cooper
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:31 pm
Location: Portsmouth Hants

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by coop12g295 »

I got 2 from the mini door co its only the flat part and you would have to
fabricate the corners and they do come with the drain tubes.Avoid the hadrian
ones like the plague no holes and creased to hell.The mini doors are fitted with
new skins ready to fit once the car is a lot further on
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

'A type' gearbox trial rebuild. First attempt at building a gearbox, only 3 parts left over :)

New mainshaft, layshaft, 2nd gear, synchros, bushes, bearings, selectors., diff ratio changed to 3.44. Not as hard to find parts for as I was expecting.

How much resistance is the plunger/spring for the 3rd gear thrust washer supposed to give? I have two springs that fit, one is short and kindof weak, the other is long but it takes so much force to push the plunger down that I don't see how to get the thrust washer over it. I might have gotten mixed up with the plunger/spring in the synchro hub.

Image
1071bob
998 Cooper
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 pm
Location: west country
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by 1071bob »

The plunger springs should be 17mm long, 3.8 diameter and the wire gauge is .76mm. They are quite strong and you'll have to use a scriber or similar to depress it enough to fit the collar. What are the three bits you've got left over? :lol:
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

Thanks. I have managed to have a moment of brain failure and put the plunger in before the spring. If anyone has any bright ideas about how to get it out... have tried magnets, heat, gluing a bolt to the top of the plunger.

Now, foiled by layshaft bearing 88G396. The new ones are about 1.04 inches long. They are about 1/8 inch too long, so I can't get the new circlips in. This bearing is supposed to be for 3 synchro a-type gears according to the somerford catalogue and minispares parts books.

Anyone know if I got sent the wrong bearings, or how to order some the right size?
I have sent a message to minispares as well.

Image
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

The plot thickens, 88G396 is the laygear bearing for B-type gears and on.
A-type laygear bearing is 3H2113.
Spoke to somerford and apparently the 88G396 bearing does not need to be used with circlips.
So that is solved.
savetheminis
Basic 850
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by savetheminis »

Door repair continues... hammerforming a new lower rail, because it has a slight arc in it.

Image

Are any of the scuttle repair panels any good? I have some Magnum branded ones that would need a lot of filler.
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: 1963 Austin Countryman

Post by guru_1071 »

savetheminis wrote: Are any of the scuttle repair panels any good? I have some Magnum branded ones that would need a lot of filler.

the only good one is the heritage one - the cheap pattern ends 'will-do' with care.

the full length pattern ones are somebodys idea of a practical joke
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
Post Reply