Page 1 of 1
fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:38 am
by colinandvenie
Hey guys, I read somewhere recently about the different fuel gauges on early MK1 mini's.
Mine is a '63 , and when the fuel gauge rises to full, it is actually running out of gas. When I fill the tank, it reads empty.
How do I tell between the different gauges without fitting them all, to get the right one ??? cheers
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:56 am
by bmcman.ie
is your fuel sender unit fitted upside down? just a thought! ian.
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:56 am
by nick rogers
The early (non-stabilised) gauge has 3 spade contacts, 2 on one side and 1 on the other. The later gauge, which I suspect you have in your 63, has only 2. I have early gauges on my website if you need one.
This whole story gets more complicated when senders get swapped around.
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:02 am
by Nevsmini
As Nick says it gets more complicated if the fuel senders are changed. Is the fuel sender bolted in or held in with a clip. A photo of both the sender on the tank and the back of the speedo and nick should be able to sort you out.
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:56 am
by colinandvenie
Cheers for the info guys, my fuel tank sender is in the pic, and the fuel gauge has three spade terminals-- 2 on the empty side, and 1 on the full side. The car is posi- earth , with no voltage stabilizer bolted behind the speedo. Any more info would be great
Cheers
Colin
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 5:06 am
by Andrew1967
I'd have thought your car should have a non stabilised gauge as its a 63. Stabilisation came in around 64 if I remember correctly.
The wiring loom at the back looks like it should have a round terminal where the rubber cap is, which bolts onto a threaded post on the early screw in sender unit. The tank looks to be a later one with the later type sender unit that uses spade terminals. It also has the pressing in it to take a diagonal securing strap which is a 70's type tank, unless overseas tanks are different ?
I might be wrong but I thought that the three terminal gauges were for the stabilised system. The extra terminal takes the link wire between the stabiliser and gauge.
Apologies if I am wrong on this and I stand to be corrected. It's 5am in the morning and I'm just off to work, so am still half asleep
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/382a4/382a4716a724ad1f6474634783c4d79acb706a9a" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:16 am
by nick rogers
Andrew is partly correct. Your problem the tank. You have a very late tank in your 63. The original one would have no diagonal stripe or a locking ring sender. It would have a 6 screw sender unit. As I said earlier, this gets more complicated when senders are swapped. Your easy solution would be a later gauge and a voltage stabiliser. If you go for this (I can supply both) do not connect the temp gauge to the stabiliser as it is probably already the correct one.
Re: fuel guage wrong ??
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:38 pm
by colinandvenie
cheers for the replies, guys, I have a later gauge and voltage regulator in my stash of parts.
Much appreciated
Colin