Re: Deleting the Fan Blade
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:50 pm
Had some Dyno-Time today and found out that the Engine is now delivering 6HP more without the Fan on the Waterpump... 

A friendly international forum for people interested in the tuning & modification of classic BMC vehicles
https://mk1-forum.net/
I found the fans needed between 3 and 5 HP to drive them, it depends on the revs and the particular fan.Fanfaniracing wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:50 pm Had some Dyno-Time today and found out that the Engine is now delivering 6HP more without the Fan on the Waterpump...![]()
As a matter of interest, which fan did you use for this test?Fanfaniracing wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:50 pm Had some Dyno-Time today and found out that the Engine is now delivering 6HP more without the Fan on the Waterpump...![]()
But isn't the more important power figure the bhph-value?Fanfaniracing wrote: ↑Sun Mar 30, 2025 11:18 pm I had the 11 Blade Fan 12G2129 on on the first Test.
Without the Fan the Engine frees 6HP more but i had the electric Fan on.
Next Time i will try without any electric consumer on...
Worth bearing in mind that the power sucked by most aerodynamic drags is proportional to the cube of the speed. If a fan follows this rule then 6HP at (say) 6000rpm would mean 3.5HP at 5000rpm, 1.75HP at 4000rpm, and 0.75HP at 3000rpm. Be interesting to see if the two power curves bear this out, or if fans are somehow exceptions to the rule.Fanfaniracing wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:50 pm Had some Dyno-Time today and found out that the Engine is now delivering 6HP more without the Fan on the Waterpump.
The Power going in to driving the fan is also pretty much proportional to the volume of air that it moves too.MagicWandWoody wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 12:14 pmWorth bearing in mind that the power sucked by most aerodynamic drags is proportional to the cube of the speed. If a fan follows this rule then 6HP at (say) 6000rpm would mean 3.5HP at 5000rpm, 1.75HP at 4000rpm, and 0.75HP at 3000rpm. Be interesting to see if the two power curves bear this out, or if fans are somehow exceptions to the rule.Fanfaniracing wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:50 pm Had some Dyno-Time today and found out that the Engine is now delivering 6HP more without the Fan on the Waterpump.
In racing, every lost HP is crucial, even at the top end of the rev range. On the other hand, most mere road-going mortals are probably losing little by keeping the stock fan.
None of the fans I've seen on the big sellers' websites say what power they are nor what fuse they use, but the size of the wires in the pics suggests currents no more than 25A-ish. That's only 300W (0.4HP) which - compared to the power of the water-pump fan - illustrates why it's not up to keeping the engine cool alone. Alternator marginal [in]efficiency means something like 0.6HP of engine power would be absorbed when the fan is on.