Equipe Arden.

General Chat with an emphasis on BMC Minis & Other iconic cars of the 1960's.
Post Reply
User avatar
Etienne B.
850 Super
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Etienne B. »

Paul,
what a fantastic thread ! You lucky man !
I was wondering - foulish questions maybe :
what is this rear toe-in/camber design I can see on one of your pictures ?
also was the central tunnel altered or just distorted - or both ? Looks strange in the picture.
I definitely love this car !
User avatar
decarcer
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:00 pm
Location: Madrid - Spain
Contact:

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by decarcer »

Etienne B. wrote:Paul,
what is this rear toe-in/camber design I can see on one of your pictures ?
Hi there

I am as curious as Etienne about this toe-in/camber design. Indeed, I've spent two days googling and searching rod-ends companies to see if it is possible to get this kind of rod ends with double threads. Unfortunately, I did not manage to find anything similar to this. It is a very smart system for toe-in/camber set up, and looks much more robust than the actual brackets sold by MiniSpares or MiniSport.

Nice pics by the way!!!!
newtune
850 Super
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:48 pm

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by newtune »

It maybe that the one on the side is just a nut welded on the side, my car has a similar setup ?

James
User avatar
decarcer
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:00 pm
Location: Madrid - Spain
Contact:

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by decarcer »

newtune wrote:It maybe that the one on the side is just a nut welded on the side, my car has a similar setup ?

James
James... would you be so kind posting pictures of yur set up?
I am afraid that welding a rod-end is not a good idea. I guess that a huge heat increase, due to welding, would probably destroy the rod-end.
I am right now in the process of restoring a rear subframe for ralling and would like to set up this system...
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by guru_1071 »

it may not be a threaded rose joint?

it looks more like a bit of tube with two threads welded to it - then you could press a threadless rose joint (what ever they are called?) into the tube after the welding was done? and hold it in place with a cap screw maybe?

thats the way i would do it
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
User avatar
decarcer
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:00 pm
Location: Madrid - Spain
Contact:

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by decarcer »

guru_1071 wrote:it may not be a threaded rose joint?

it looks more like a bit of tube with two threads welded to it - then you could press a threadless rose joint (what ever they are called?) into the tube after the welding was done? and hold it in place with a cap screw maybe?

thats the way i would do it
I've gone through all the photobucket album of this car (plenty of pics!!!) and there are detailed photos of the restored rear subframe.

What I see in the pic is a rod-end, (or a rose joint... don't know the exact english word!!! :oops: ) with two threads in 90º angle. Then a 90º metal plate welded to the rear bracket where the rod-end is bolted.

Guru... the way you would do it seem fine as well... BUt welds shourl de perfect in order to make the rogh aligment, and suffer the tension!!!
Last edited by decarcer on Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
GraemeC
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2267
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Hiding From The Dog... NW Eng
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by GraemeC »

After staring at it for a while I am sure I can see two rod ends, one behind the other, with the camber adjusting one at the inboard side.
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by guru_1071 »

GraemeC wrote:After staring at it for a while

you will go blind graeme :?
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
User avatar
decarcer
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:00 pm
Location: Madrid - Spain
Contact:

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by decarcer »

GraemeC wrote:After staring at it for a while I am sure I can see two rod ends, one behind the other, with the camber adjusting one at the inboard side.
Hi Graeme...

To me looks a doble threaded rod end... and no sings if any welding... still wondering where to find such rod-end!!! :roll:
Last edited by decarcer on Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Yes Guru is spot on, it is a bit of pipe welded to a washer and a couple of 5/16 bolts brazed to it, all the suspension mods were made in house at Arden and made so well that they survived the test of time and are still working as well as the day they were put on.
Incedently, I had much help with the detail on this car by Norman Seeney who was co owner of the car with Jim Whithouse,
I sent Norman many pictures of the car and suspension parts so I could authenticate parts, amazingly all the suspension bar the hydro stuff (it had been converted to dry) was all origional.
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Etienne, yes the floor had been modified at the front of the tunnel, it had been cut out and a crude bit of ali had been bashed around and riveted into place, I would presume for the exhaust manifold, this was not a Arden mod but a later mod whilst in the hands of Barry Phillips who was also responsable for all the rest of the light weight hole drilling. I believe the work was carried out by Reg Cook ?
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

A few more pics of the car when we recieved it.

Image

Image


Image


Image
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Image

This was the dry fit of the rear sub frame, it was a right pain making it all fit well with the solid mounts. I would imagine that it would be ALOT worse if you were to do it with a fully built up frame the right way round.
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Image

the engine was sent down from Aukland for a dry fit as the inlet manifold had long since dissapeared, it was set up in car to establish the correct positioning of the throttle bodies.
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Image


Image


Image


Image

Plenty of room under the bonnet.
austinisuseless

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by austinisuseless »

S'pose someone has to shove some random photos in, sometime,

Image

Image

Image
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

With a name like yours I would'nt expect anything less :lol: Nice pics though.
User avatar
sandman
998 Cooper
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: Langhus, Norway

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by sandman »

Any chance of some close-up shots of the suspension mods both front and rear??

I am also curious about the upper arms and how the damper was fitted.... looks like it had an extra pin???

Image
Cheers,

Ed_
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

Here is the front suspension broken down.

Image
Austin Costin
998 Cooper
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Equipe Arden.

Post by Austin Costin »

To be honest I have no idea why or when the extra shock tube was added, Norman did,nt comment on it either, if anyone has a good reason i would be interested to hear.

Here are a couple more pics of the fit up.

Image

Image
Post Reply