Hydrolastic displacers

Post any technical questions or queries here.
Post Reply
abri
998 Cooper
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:25 pm

Hydrolastic displacers

Post by abri »

I changed my '65 from hydro to dry a while back & am starting to think it might have been a mistake. The mechanic didn't give me the original parts back that he removed. My question to you is, given the variety that exists in hydrolastic displacers, are they interchangable between standard saloons across the models that came with hydro? In other words are 65, 66, 67 displacers exactly the same if they came off a bog standard Austin Mini? Or are they dated?

Thanks
madaboutcherry
998 Cooper
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:26 am

Re: Hydrolastic displacers

Post by madaboutcherry »

apart from S displacers, all others are interchangable between models as well as front to back.
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19842
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Hydrolastic displacers

Post by mk1 »

There were however various different versions over the years, different valving and spring rates, as well as a variety of different conditions.

Mixing & matching is never straight forward with hydro. It can be done, but usually takes more than a little buggering about to get right. This is why you see so many hydro cars either nose or tail up, or wonky in some other way. Mixing & matching displacers IS NEVER straightforward.
abri
998 Cooper
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:25 pm

Re: Hydrolastic displacers

Post by abri »

Thanks guys.

Mark, so in theory if you get all displacers from the same donor car and install them in a different one it should be fine?
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19842
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Hydrolastic displacers

Post by mk1 »

That is indeed the ideal way of doing it. It saves a heck of a lot of heartache in the long run.
Post Reply