OOOOLD bottom arms
- Vegard
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
OOOOLD bottom arms
Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
pre 1964 ones where like this
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
- Vegard
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
Thanks. Does anyone have any and would like to measure the ID of the parallell hole?
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 pm
- Location: west country
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
The parallel bore size is 7/8"I.D. [22.2mm] The castings carry the same part number for both sides, only handed by which side the taper for the swivel pin was machined. They look like this :-Vegard wrote:Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:45 pm
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
Putting on my cruel head, one might thinking you were thinking of fitting Uniball inserts in a limited modification racing class.Vegard wrote:Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
- Vegard
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:45 pm
- Location: France
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19843
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
can you explain more about this???
If you are referring to the "sneaky" modification.
It has been said that some less than entirely scrupulous Appendix K competitors have been known to fit a spherical joint to the head of "standard" bottom arms & then cover these with cut down standard rubber bushes at either side to hide them. This has the advantage of stiffening the suspension up whilst still looking like the "standard" rubber joints that are required as part of Appendix K rules.
I am however sure that Vegard is simply asking the question so he can differentiate very early arms from the later tapered ones
If you are referring to the "sneaky" modification.
It has been said that some less than entirely scrupulous Appendix K competitors have been known to fit a spherical joint to the head of "standard" bottom arms & then cover these with cut down standard rubber bushes at either side to hide them. This has the advantage of stiffening the suspension up whilst still looking like the "standard" rubber joints that are required as part of Appendix K rules.
I am however sure that Vegard is simply asking the question so he can differentiate very early arms from the later tapered ones
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 pm
- Location: west country
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
'Stroke pulling' and motor racing go hand in hand. I've seen and heard of some brilliant 'cheats' over the years, remember its only cheating if you get caught!
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:26 pm
- Location: Warwickshire
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: OOOOLD bottom arms
Like the " low " broadspeed dolimite sprint , special body XJ12 jag and the saloon TWR raced that was " wider " than std