OOOOLD bottom arms

General Chat with an emphasis on BMC Minis & Other iconic cars of the 1960's.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by Vegard »

Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
guru_1071
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by guru_1071 »

pre 1964 ones where like this
please note, these are my own, individual sales, nothing whatsoever to do with my employer, minispares
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by Vegard »

Thanks. Does anyone have any and would like to measure the ID of the parallell hole?
1071bob
998 Cooper
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 pm
Location: west country
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by 1071bob »

Vegard wrote:Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
The parallel bore size is 7/8"I.D. [22.2mm] The castings carry the same part number for both sides, only handed by which side the taper for the swivel pin was machined. They look like this :-
Image
ivor badger
998 Cooper
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:45 pm

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by ivor badger »

Vegard wrote:Word on the street says that the old bottom arms weren't conical from both sides, but parallell. Are these hard to find, and what was the bore in them. Anyone in the know?
Putting on my cruel head, one might thinking you were thinking of fitting Uniball inserts in a limited modification racing class. ;)
User avatar
Vegard
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by Vegard »

He hey, that'd be illegal!!
NZmember
998 Cooper
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:45 pm
Location: France

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by NZmember »

Anarok moment - can you explain more about this???
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19843
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by mk1 »

can you explain more about this???

If you are referring to the "sneaky" modification.

It has been said that some less than entirely scrupulous Appendix K competitors have been known to fit a spherical joint to the head of "standard" bottom arms & then cover these with cut down standard rubber bushes at either side to hide them. This has the advantage of stiffening the suspension up whilst still looking like the "standard" rubber joints that are required as part of Appendix K rules.

I am however sure that Vegard is simply asking the question so he can differentiate very early arms from the later tapered ones :lol:
1071bob
998 Cooper
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 pm
Location: west country
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by 1071bob »

'Stroke pulling' and motor racing go hand in hand. I've seen and heard of some brilliant 'cheats' over the years, remember its only cheating if you get caught!
251 ENG
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:26 pm
Location: Warwickshire
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: OOOOLD bottom arms

Post by 251 ENG »

Like the " low " broadspeed dolimite sprint , special body XJ12 jag and the saloon TWR raced that was " wider " than std :lol: :lol:
Post Reply