570 FMO
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
570 FMO
by worksminis » 30 Apr 2017, 18:48
Monte Carlo January 64. Makinen/Vanson. Group 2.
Used as a recce car?
Spa-Sofia-Liege August 64. Wadsworth/Wood. Non-homologated spec. cars permitted.
Sold to K. James
Browning records this car (and 569FMO) as first registered in November 63. This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number.
There is a suggestion the 64 Monte rally cars were all used for Monte recce at some point. (The non-FMO Monte cars were older registrations). This would explain the Nov 63 registration.
The Monte car would have had a 1071 engine like winner 33 EJB (1275 not yet homologated).
The Liege car had a 1275 (1293). It is described by Wood in “The Last Liege” as, towards the end, “the body was getting a little loose at the seams”. It had been kicked by a donkey on the rear n/s quarter. It had been rolled on to its side to change the couplings (probably not as carefully as that was done on later occasions). The sump guard was held up with rope around the front body top Xmember.
It seems likely that, as for 569FMO, the reg number was sold with the car because, as a pre-suffix registration, it was already looking a bit dated.
There is no proof available that there was not a number plate swap with another car between the two works appearances but it seems unlikely.
Monte Carlo January 64. Makinen/Vanson. Group 2.
Used as a recce car?
Spa-Sofia-Liege August 64. Wadsworth/Wood. Non-homologated spec. cars permitted.
Sold to K. James
Browning records this car (and 569FMO) as first registered in November 63. This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number.
There is a suggestion the 64 Monte rally cars were all used for Monte recce at some point. (The non-FMO Monte cars were older registrations). This would explain the Nov 63 registration.
The Monte car would have had a 1071 engine like winner 33 EJB (1275 not yet homologated).
The Liege car had a 1275 (1293). It is described by Wood in “The Last Liege” as, towards the end, “the body was getting a little loose at the seams”. It had been kicked by a donkey on the rear n/s quarter. It had been rolled on to its side to change the couplings (probably not as carefully as that was done on later occasions). The sump guard was held up with rope around the front body top Xmember.
It seems likely that, as for 569FMO, the reg number was sold with the car because, as a pre-suffix registration, it was already looking a bit dated.
There is no proof available that there was not a number plate swap with another car between the two works appearances but it seems unlikely.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 570 FMO
by davidscothorn » 29 May 2017, 15:43
DVLA AUSTIN MINI COOPER S 1963 1071 DOR 12/63 SORN MOTX
DVLA AUSTIN MINI COOPER S 1963 1071 DOR 12/63 SORN MOTX
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 570 FMO
by davidscothorn » 06 May 2017, 19:41
I seem to recall that 1963 A suffix was only used when Licensing Authorities had run out of their allocated letters. I have no suggestion as to why pre-suffix were in use in early 1964
I seem to recall that 1963 A suffix was only used when Licensing Authorities had run out of their allocated letters. I have no suggestion as to why pre-suffix were in use in early 1964
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 570 FMO
by davidscothorn » 06 May 2017, 19:35
.............. and presumably also applies to 33 EJB and 569FMO
.............. and presumably also applies to 33 EJB and 569FMO
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 570 FMO
by davidscothorn » 06 May 2017, 19:20
''This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number''.
The answer seems because, for some reason, Berkshire County Council did not allocate any A suffix numbers.
In fact, the B suffix is not issued until February 1964(BL, JB and MO) and March 1964 (RX)
So, presumably there were some pre-suffix cars registered as late as January 1964
''This raises the question as to why the reg number is not an A suffix number''.
The answer seems because, for some reason, Berkshire County Council did not allocate any A suffix numbers.
In fact, the B suffix is not issued until February 1964(BL, JB and MO) and March 1964 (RX)
So, presumably there were some pre-suffix cars registered as late as January 1964
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19842
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 570 FMO
Images
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Costafortune
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2020
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:26 am
- Location: Sheffield On Thames
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: 570 FMO
A registrations were virtually all London issue.
B registrations were more common.
1965 was the first year for suffix letters across the board.
B registrations were more common.
1965 was the first year for suffix letters across the board.
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2054
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:25 pm
- Location: Crossgar County Down Northern Ireland
Re: 570 FMO
This car is over here in Northern Ireland. Ken Colbert restored it to a very high standard in 2017. These photographs were taken at our local show in 2017
Alan
Alan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 2054
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:25 pm
- Location: Crossgar County Down Northern Ireland
Re: 570 FMO
That is two of my friends Martin Holland and Elgin Greer doing final touches to 570 FMO before the show opened to the public
Alan
Alan
-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:13 pm
- Location: West Cheshire
Re: 570 FMO
Not many Authorities issued A suffix registrations. I had a December ‘63 850 SDL reg 396 HDM which was a Flintshire registration. I’ve never seen a - - - JDM registration so presumably went to B suffix 1 January 1964.
Re: 570 FMO
1964 Monte
Last edited by surfblue63 on Thu Apr 07, 2022 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.