Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post any technical questions or queries here.
Post Reply
nick rogers
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: South Yorks.
Been thanked: 1 time

Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by nick rogers »

After all my years doing this I should know the answer but doubts creep in. I noticed 1071 Bob's front frame is gloss and I know Bob strives for correct detail. My own donor front frame came from a mk3 car and was undersealed all over. On chipping off the black stuff I found bright gloss black paint. So what is the consensus of opinion ?
Daz1968
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:41 pm
Location: Oldbury west midlands

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by Daz1968 »

The original hydro frame I had was gloss, I knew it was original paint as still had the mowog writing it was similar to paint on headlamp buckets.
User avatar
Peter Laidler
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 6398
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:35 pm
Location: Abingdon Oxfordshire
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by Peter Laidler »

I'd say that they were meant to be satin. The problem is the painter. If he doesn't keep his gun stirred up, the paint slowly turns thinner and more glossy. And when you've got industrial paint shops for production, the drums just don't get stirred up. At the start of the day (or shift) some of the stuff comes out almost matt.
Old English White
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2641
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Southern England
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by Old English White »

I think all such parts were gloss but not a full gloss like a hearse because possibly the paint used wasn't the same quality and certainly the preparation wasn't as thorough. Most components didn't even have a primer on them.
AndyPen
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: South Wales
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by AndyPen »

Hi Nick,

I agree with the consensus that its slightly shinier than satin, but not full gloss. I've got a 64 I removed many years ago and its clear on the towers for example that there was a shine.
morris cooper
Basic 850
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:34 am
Location: East Yorkshire
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by morris cooper »

Most of the frames Ive seen with original paint have shown a gloss finish some degree. I think the subframes would be dipped like many of the other black components, brake back plates, steering column outer, gear lever boot retainer, washer bracket, pedal box etc, all finished in black without primer.
Bill.
nick rogers
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: South Yorks.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by nick rogers »

IMG_0969.jpeg
This is my NOS genuine dry rear frame. Note: no holes for hydro unions like the modern frames.This would seem to be halfway between gloss and satin. On the other hand, it's been stored for probably 50 years ! That might have some bearing on the shade.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
winabbey
998 Cooper
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by winabbey »

By 1966 BMC Australia realised the standard front subframe supplied from the UK was not strong enough to withstand the rigors of Australian roads, so they were modified locally by adding additional bracing welded into position in several spots.

According to the legend on the engineering drawing the subframe was finished in black air drying enamel. It doesn't specify the finish, whether gloss, satin or matt.

AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 2 of 3 Part.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
MiNiKiN
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:15 pm
Location: Graz/Austria // NN1 4ST previously
Has thanked: 85 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by MiNiKiN »

winabbey wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 4:13 am By 1966 BMC Australia realised the standard front subframe supplied from the UK was not strong enough to withstand the rigors of Australian roads, so they were modified locally by adding additional bracing welded into position in several spots.
According to the legend on the engineering drawing the subframe was finished in black air drying enamel. It doesn't specify the finish, whether gloss, satin or matt.
AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 2 of 3 Part.jpg
Whilst the gloss grade on your drawing is interesting, I would be may interested in the missing parts of the sketch - i.e. what strengthening they applied and where....
Yes I am a nerd: I am researching the Austrian Mini-racing scene of the 60s and 70s :ugeek:
User avatar
Ronnie
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1287
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: N/E England Where the SAND is GOLDEN and the sea is always COLD!!
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by Ronnie »

MiNiKiN wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 7:23 am
winabbey wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 4:13 am By 1966 BMC Australia realised the standard front subframe supplied from the UK was not strong enough to withstand the rigors of Australian roads, so they were modified locally by adding additional bracing welded into position in several spots.
According to the legend on the engineering drawing the subframe was finished in black air drying enamel. It doesn't specify the finish, whether gloss, satin or matt.
AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 2 of 3 Part.jpg
Whilst the gloss grade on your drawing is interesting, I would be may interested in the missing parts of the sketch - i.e. what strengthening they applied and where....
DITTO 8-)
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19834
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by mk1 »

I would say that the paint was "supposed to be" gloss, but was in most cases somewhere between satin & gloss-ish.
User avatar
winabbey
998 Cooper
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by winabbey »

Reinforcement of the front subframe was done in three spots.

1. Extra welding of the tie rod bracket to subframe.

Prior to this change being implemented in production for all Mini models BMC Dealers were told to modify existing Cooper S pursuit cars used by New South Wales Police when brought in for service by drilling through the existing bracket and subframe and adding a bolt and nut to assist in making the bracket more secure.

AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 3 of 3 Subset.jpg


2. Addition of a triangular steel tube section 1.5" long (part # AYA5080) to the inner edge of the subframe side section below the engine mounts.

AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 2 of 3 Subset.jpg


3. Addition of a steel plate (part # AYA5060/61) to the base of the subframe tower.

AYA5084 Rework Subframe Complete Sheet 1 of 3 Subset.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Ronnie
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1287
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: N/E England Where the SAND is GOLDEN and the sea is always COLD!!
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by Ronnie »

Thank You :!: ;)👍
User avatar
winabbey
998 Cooper
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Subframes: Gloss or satin ?

Post by winabbey »

Here's the BMC Australia Service Liaison Summary that describes the in-service workaround.

SLS 160 p3 subset.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply