Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: ☀️ Dublin
- Been thanked: 1 time
Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Here is a very helpful chart for anyone thinking modifying an engine with different pistons etc. I wonder what is the best combo???
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19846
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
A useful table.
But, what crank has a 66mm stroke?
Also some of the colour coding is a bit misleading.
No one has used Imp pistons in a mini for years.
M
But, what crank has a 66mm stroke?
Also some of the colour coding is a bit misleading.
No one has used Imp pistons in a mini for years.
M
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: ☀️ Dublin
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Answers
1. Stroked crank
2. Change the colours if you want
3. So what!!!
1. Stroked crank
2. Change the colours if you want
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f655e/f655e5a897f4cf03561745e505c8e658e8c1aaf2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
3. So what!!!
- rich@minispares.com
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 6806
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:16 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
it doesn't have the SA1100 crank stroke(s) on it either, so you need to add 68.26 & 70.00 to take into account both variations
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: ☀️ Dublin
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Your just lucky I did use the word Imp in one of my answers
Anyway my point to this was to kick off a discussion on what combo's people have used in the past etc etc failures and successes!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae224/ae2240004753d01a88fe49a30e41593baba89a14" alt="Wink ;-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/382a4/382a4716a724ad1f6474634783c4d79acb706a9a" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Anyway my point to this was to kick off a discussion on what combo's people have used in the past etc etc failures and successes!
-
- 998 Cooper
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:39 pm
- Location: Herefordshire UK
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Back in the 70s yes imp pistons were used along with triumph PI and what they called Devon pistons ( BMC ) but as special piston sizes were produced ie 73.5 etc they melted away into the distant past , possibly literately .
-
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:19 pm
- Location: Essex
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Having owned and built a couple of 1480 cc race engines , this would be my choice . You can't beat the tourque of the extra cc . They may not rev as high a a short stroke but a lot less chance of a blow up ...... Ken
1963 austin Cooper s mk1 1071
1966 Austin Cooper s mk1 1275
1968 Austin Cooper mk2 998
1962 Morris mini super 850
Porsche 997 turbo S
Ford transit van 280s.
I am from Essex
1966 Austin Cooper s mk1 1275
1968 Austin Cooper mk2 998
1962 Morris mini super 850
Porsche 997 turbo S
Ford transit van 280s.
I am from Essex
- smithyrc30
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:40 am
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Isn't the third column from the left 68.26????rich@minispares.com wrote:it doesn't have the SA1100 crank stroke(s) on it either, so you need to add 68.26 & 70.00 to take into account both variations
- Pete
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 11182
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:47 pm
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 106 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Went the 1149 route on a Mk1 Cooper many years ago, wasn't really worth the effort and a gudgeon pin came loose trashing the block. Did a 1341 which revved nicely and produced 108bhp but just didn't have the b*ll*cks that my 1426 had in my Vita-ish Cooper S. Had so much torque that it didn't really recognise the steepest gradients!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19846
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Away with the Faries
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
I have always been a fan of the short stroke revers. I have built a 970 crank / 73.5mm screamer for my brother which went like the clappers & easily revved to 9,500+, it did however get through head gaskets like I get through underpants.
I have built many, many 1070 /SA1100 cranks with various standard overbores, usually plus 40 or 60, these always go very well & give a smooth & beautifully behaved road engine.
I have never liked the lumpy bumpy nature of the 1275 engine, but the short stroke 1299 in the Hornet was a bit of an eye opener, no where near as smooth as a true short stroker, but it gave excellent power, well until Rich blew it up it did anywaydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3873c/3873cda26f8afbd1cfbeb6acf827edba37309766" alt="Smile :)"
I am currently building an all steel appendix K 1293 for it, so we will see what that is like won't we.
I have over the years built many other engines both small & latrge bore, but the above ones are my favourites.
M
I have built many, many 1070 /SA1100 cranks with various standard overbores, usually plus 40 or 60, these always go very well & give a smooth & beautifully behaved road engine.
I have never liked the lumpy bumpy nature of the 1275 engine, but the short stroke 1299 in the Hornet was a bit of an eye opener, no where near as smooth as a true short stroker, but it gave excellent power, well until Rich blew it up it did anyway
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3873c/3873cda26f8afbd1cfbeb6acf827edba37309766" alt="Smile :)"
I am currently building an all steel appendix K 1293 for it, so we will see what that is like won't we.
I have over the years built many other engines both small & latrge bore, but the above ones are my favourites.
M
- rich@minispares.com
- 1275 Cooper S
- Posts: 6806
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:16 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
these car breaking works drivers eh............mk1 wrote:, but it gave excellent power, well until Rich blew it up it did anyway
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24565/24565ad28cbf1c41beada5c355cc86ea0e867475" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
-
- 850 Super
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:20 am
Re: Engine Sizes. Bore v's Stroke
Last A series I built was a 16v 73.5x86mm 1460. Now I'm building the other end off the spectrum with an 8 port 970 at +40. Not sure what I'll prefer but I suspect the high rever is likely to tick more boxes for me.