making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post any technical questions or queries here.
Post Reply
User avatar
YMJ
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Beyond the Sun

making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by YMJ »

Most of the photos I need to put onto the site are over 512kb which is the max size limit. How do I make them "smaller"?
User avatar
trevorhp
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:38 pm
Location: Taunton Somerset UK Formerly Kingswinford
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by trevorhp »

Download Photoscape free (its like photoshop but free) then open the picture and resize to 25%

Or open in 'Paint' then resize
"Ambition: the first step on the road to disappointment" Homer. J. Simpson
"Disappointment: the first step on the road to enlightenment" Buddha
"Enlightenment: the first step on the road to ambition" Dalai Lama

No point in hoping to go to Heaven...... I won't know anyone there.
KDK 320F
HDK 443E
DJJ 226H
TFD 47G
PKV 375
I x 1967 originally Red since 1968 Blue,Ex-Race Cooper S Bodyshell only have Commission plate as ID.
1 x chassis 007 1967 Cox GTM
User avatar
Pete
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 11182
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:47 pm
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 106 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by Pete »

Or just right click your original and copy. Simply resize your copy (so you don't lose your higher res original) in Microsoft picture editor.
surfblue63

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by surfblue63 »

There some instructions on resizing pictures in this thread

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10562&hilit=picture+edit
User avatar
timmy201
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:57 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by timmy201 »

I use the Microsoft Office Picture Manager - just right click on the photo in your folder and "open with" the program.

If you change the view to "thumbnail" you can select many photos at once (holding shift and clicking on the photos), then edit pictures and resize. I pick a percentage to resize by (eg 25%) so that way the portrait and landscape photos end up being shrunk the same amount.

OR you can register an account with photobucket, Flickr, etc and upload your photos there and link them back here with the code. I use Flickr and it resizes my photos automatically
User avatar
woodypup59
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: London UK
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by woodypup59 »

I use the picture editor bundled with Microdsoft Office.

Under Edit - it has "compress" picture with several options.

Try each of these to get the picture UNDER the number of kB you ae limited to.
Jono
998 Cooper
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:34 pm

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by Jono »

I've been using the free version of this for a couple of years now, for professional use in reports where sometimes I have up to 200 images:

http://www.fotosizer.com/

It's great as you can batch re size a few hundred pics at a time and it automatically saves the originals at the 'as taken' size.

Saying that if it's only a single photo I often use MS Picture Manager, using the methods described above.
User avatar
Frogeye61
998 Cooper
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:56 pm
Location: Storkøbenhavn

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by Frogeye61 »

Sorry, I try to stay from ms, so for almost all that I do, it's IrfanView.
Jono
998 Cooper
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:34 pm

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by Jono »

I tried Irfanview, could not get away with it.

I found Fotosizer to be much more intuitive (at least for a tech Luddite such as myself)
User avatar
Frogeye61
998 Cooper
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:56 pm
Location: Storkøbenhavn

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by Frogeye61 »

ctl-r to resize
User avatar
sandman
998 Cooper
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: Langhus, Norway

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by sandman »

Cheers,

Ed_
User avatar
snoopy64
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:40 pm
Location: M96, North Cotswolds , UK
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by snoopy64 »

The MCR forum seems to resize automatically ... Is it a forum or profile setting maybe?
Cheers

Kevin
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19846
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by mk1 »

The reason there is a maximum file size quota on the images that people can upload as an attachment is that the space these images takes up has to be paid for. The MCR pay hundreds & hundreds of pounds a year to pay for band width, storage and an administrator to run & maintain the MCR forum. Despite this, for most of the time its been in existence it has been utter crap.

I pay for & run the forum myself, I have on occasion had to ask for donations to help, but 99% of the effort & 80% of the money come from me personally.

512k is a MASSIVE image size & there is absolutely NO reason at all why an image larger than 90k or so should ever be needed.

For example the first image attachment below is 900 pixels wide & it takes up 84k

The second attached image is 2500 pixels wide & around 170k (double click on image to see it at its full size)

Can you imagine how huge an image nearly 3 times the size of that one would be? Certainly far to big for anyone to look at on any monitor currently available.

As I have always said, the best way to add pictures to the forum is to use 3rd party free hosting services. As some members were unable or unwilling to do that, I gave forum members the option of uploading images as attachments. EVERY k of every image costs, but I thought it was a worthwhile addition to keep the small number of members who use that option happy.

Now I find moans that people can't upload unedited images! Reducing the size of a given image is ridiculously simple as has been explained by the multiple posters who have suggested many different ways to achieve this.

I attempted a full upgrade of the site earlier this year, this upgrade would have given me all sorts of extra options like auto re sizing of images. The almost universal reaction to this upgrade was horror & it appears that everyone is generally speaking far happier with the existing set up than any potential "upgrade".

I appreciate that this is probably not the reply you wanted or expected, but I know absolutely NOTHING about computers of computing. It's just that some years ago, I decided that it might be nice to run a forum of the back of my web site, so I learned how to do it as I went along. I feel sure that learning how to re size the odd image MUST be easier than running the whole shebang!

Sorry I can't please all the people all the time.

mark F
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
ianh1968
1275 Cooper S
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:00 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by ianh1968 »

Mark,

You do an excellent job of maintaining the main Mk1 site and this forum,
and long may it continue...

The main problem with image sizes is "bloat".

The gadget manufacturers create higher and higher definitions for their
product as selling points. The reason being that a 20 billion pixels per inch
resolution is obviously far better and more marketable than a competitor's
20 million pixels.

What they, and the suckers that buy this stuff (that's us), fail to realise is
that for most purposes, this is totally un-necessary, but it's "progress"...

I remember back in about 1995, a new operating system came out,
along with new generation of lightening fast 75 Mhz processors. You could
load up a picture in less than a few seconds, and most of the ones around
at that time were about the file-size of the ones you show above.

Only when viewing "special interest" photos and zooming in to see the
gory (sorry, intricate) details would the images get a bit "blocky".

I used to get a bit fed up looking at some of the humungous pictures on
the forum, the ones where you could only actually fit about a quarter of
it on the screen and had to scroll around and try to imagine what the whole
picture would look like if you could see all of it in one hit.

I for one am very glad that there is a size limit - As you have already said,
and others have demonstrated, there are many ways to resize photos and
most of these are easy to get and simple to use, if you can be arsed...

I am a non-Micro$oft merchant and use the GIMP - No, not some kind of
pervy rubber suit, but the GNU-Image-Ma-nippl-ating-Program.

As regards the "Auto-Resize" feature mentioned which is available on
"another" site, yes, the sounds like a reasonable idea BUT:

Even if the server did re-size an image smaller, then discard the original,
the problem of network bandwidth for the upload is still an issue. Many
people don't appreciate that, as well as server disk space, the uploading
of files in terms of bandwidth also costs money. It also slows the traffic
down for other users.

The amount of time/effort I spend re-sizing my own photo's to post here
is minimal and I consider it it be a very small sacrifice to pay to be able to
participate in such a fantastic forum.

(Please) Keep up the good work!

Ian
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19846
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Away with the Faries
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: making photos "small" enough to publish on the site

Post by mk1 »

Thanks Ian,

It was a bit of a bad day on Friday & I was a bit grumpy, sorry if I offended anyone with my comments above.

M
Post Reply