The future of Hydrolastic suspension

General Chat with an emphasis on BMC Minis & Other iconic cars of the 1960's. Includes information on MK1 Action days.
User avatar
iain1967s
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:46 am
Location: Cambridge, MA, USA

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by iain1967s »

mk1 wrote:the vac side of both my hydro pumps is knackered
You can use one of these to re-seal the vacuum piston on the original Churchill pump. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160403613048
User avatar
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19463
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: York-ish
Contact:

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by mk1 »

Thanks for the heads, up, I'll try one & see how it goes.

M
User avatar
winabbey
Posts: 575
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by winabbey »

Just noticed a post on the Google Austin1800 Group page regarding the re-manufacturing of displacers. Is there a focal point on here involved in the development who could comment further?

I have just received an update on the remanufacture of the hydrolastic units. First the good news it appears that all of the original Dunlop documentation has now been found and good progress has been made with the development of the units by a "large automotive organisation" which is partnering the sponsoring company and I was told is very enthusiastic.

However, because of Brexit the R&D budget has temporarily, we hope, been reduced which inevitably means delays. As indicated earlier it is likely that the first units to be made available will be for the ADO16 (1100/1300) range which also fit the crab rears.

Next update will be mid year.

David
Cammsjb
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 7:40 pm
Location: Lancashire

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by Cammsjb »

That's good news.
Will the units have the original type of herringbone pattern pipes?
User avatar
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19463
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: York-ish
Contact:

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by mk1 »

That is great news re the displacer developments. However, I must wonder about the logic of the commercial entities involved when you think about the numbers you may or may not sell.

Top marks to the 1100 / 1300 guys who seem to have sold them the idea though.
User avatar
Peter Laidler
Posts: 5297
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:35 pm
Location: Abingdon Oxfordshire

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by Peter Laidler »

Here here Mk1Mark.

Good idea but the economics must surely outweigh the realities here. Having said that and having done a lot of practical stuff and physics/volumetric maths relating to the hydro units over the past couple of years, I'd certainly be making a couple of suggestions or modifications to re-manufacture if it were in my gift. Firstly, the now totally rusted out by now internal non-valves would be pressed from tubular brass - along with anything else internal too. And the hose would be threaded on to the unit and therefore invisible to originality fiends.
Rear hose would be standard length/configuration
Front hose type 1 would be in two parts with a schrader/filler valve at the top most point to a) fill the system and b) vent the air. No need thereafter for a hydro cabinet
Front hose type 2 would be the standard rear hose so that the masochists could keep standard and continue to use the cabinet.

Just my thoughts, thinking on my feet as now retired engineers are prone to do!
Supersonic
Posts: 2054
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:25 pm
Location: Crossgar County Down Northern Ireland

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by Supersonic »

Peter and Winabbey,

The 1100 Club had identified the need for replacement hydrolastic suspension units a good number of years ago. There was wide consultation within the club and 100% agreement that funds should be set aside to cover the research and development and subsequent production costs.

Unlike the Mini / Elf / Hornet the 1100 / 1300 1800 / 2200 don't have the option of dry suspension. I made that clear from the outset that we should as part of this development include the Mini / Riley Elf / Wolseley Hornet and the 1800 / 2200 Austin / Morris / Wolseley cars. I also pointed out that the ADO 16 automatic cars had heavier hydrolastic units as did the Mini, Elf and Hornet automatic cars. I did suggest that we should consider the heavier unit that would suit all. I’m sure the other people involved agreed with my thinking. Other members who were much involved with this project were Derek Bayliss, Chris Morris, Mervyn Irvine and the late David Brett, all from engineering backgrounds and knowledgeable individuals. Dave Wilkins would be able to provide much more updated information on this and can be contacted at magazine-editor@the1100club.com

Alan :D
User avatar
Hipwell
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 3:02 pm
Location: Solihull, UK

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by Hipwell »

Fair play, but what is the survival rate of an 11/1300, let alone an 18/2200?
User avatar
mk1
Site Admin
Posts: 19463
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: York-ish
Contact:

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by mk1 »

I can't help but think that Hipwell is right.

I just don't see how the figures on this can add up at all.

I know that a certain Mini Spares supplier looked very seriously into doing Mini Hydro units, but the project hit the buffers because they struggled to find the full spec & drawings.
Supersonic
Posts: 2054
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:25 pm
Location: Crossgar County Down Northern Ireland

Re: The future of Hydrolastic suspension

Post by Supersonic »

mk1 wrote:I can't help but think that Hipwell is right.

I just don't see how the figures on this can add up at all.

I know that a certain Mini Spares supplier looked very seriously into doing Mini Hydro units, but the project hit the buffers because they struggled to find the full spec & drawings.

I thought the same regards car numbers still around in context with the British Isles. Then think about the Southern Hemisphere, there are still large numbers of Minis and 1100 / 1300 cars that have survived in these dry warm countries.

And again, this project is about ten years down the road which has not helped, given many Minis have now been converted to dry suspenion. :)

Alan
Post Reply